pta
>> Sent: Monday 26th October 2020 17:00
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Performance issues with CursorMark
>>
>> Hey Markus,
>>
>> What are you sorting on? Do you have docValues enabled on the sort field ?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct
> Sent: Monday 26th October 2020 17:00
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance issues with CursorMark
>
> Hey Markus,
>
> What are you sorting on? Do you have docValues enabled on the sort field ?
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:36 AM Markus Jelsma
>
Hey Markus,
What are you sorting on? Do you have docValues enabled on the sort field ?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:36 AM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been using a simple Python tool for a long time that eases
> movement of data between Solr collections, it uses CursorMark to fetch
>
Okay. Just to re-emphasize something I said but which may not have been
clear, it isn’t an either-or for filter & sort. Filter with the spatial
field type that makes sense for filtering, sort (or boost) with the spatial
field type that makes sense for sorting. RPT sucks for distance sorting,
Lat
Hi Dirk,
The RPT field type can be used for distance sorting/boosting but it’s a
memory pig when used as-such so don’t do it unless you have to. You only
have to if you have a multi-valued point field. If you have single-valued,
use LatLonType specifically for distance sorting.
Your sample quer
That query is representative of some of the queries in my test, but I
didn't notice any correlation between using the match all docs query and
poor query performance. Here's another example of a query that took longer
than expected.
qt=en&q=dress green
leather&fq=userId:(383)&fq={!tag=productR
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Hayden Muhl wrote:
> I was doing some performance testing on facet queries and I noticed
> something odd. Most queries tended to be under 500 ms, but every so often
> the query time jumped to something like 5000 ms.
>
> q=*:*&fq={!tag=productBrandId}productBrandId:
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Tor Henning Ueland
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
>>
>> The search with couple of parameters bringing 650 counts(out of 2500 approx)
>> and taking around 3
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
>
> The search with couple of parameters bringing 650 counts(out of 2500 approx)
> and taking around 30 seconds
> The schema.xml have more than 100 fields.
You have of course started with the basics like making sure that the
index is less th
"solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance issues
http://www.lucidimagination.com/content/scaling-lucene-and-solr
Has good guidance.
Wrt 1. What is the issue - mem, cpu or query perf or indexing process
On Nov 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Lalit Kuma
http://www.lucidimagination.com/content/scaling-lucene-and-solr
Has good guidance.
Wrt 1. What is the issue - mem, cpu or query perf or indexing process
On Nov 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
> Hello:
> We recently have seen performance issues of SOLR (running on jetty).
>
> W
What are you returning? I'd be quite surprised if it was the search, so
first I'd look elsewhere. In particular, are you returning all 1,000 pages?
What happens if you specify returning a small field (the fl= parameter).
Also, look at the debug output of the query, it breaks down the various
phase
Are you storing the full 1,000 pages in the index? If so, that is
probably not helping either.
On 7/23/10, ahammad wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an index with lots of different types of documents. One of those
> types basically contains extracts of PDF docs. Some of those PDFs can have
> 1000+ pag
Do you use highlighting? ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters )
Try to disable it and compare performance.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:52 PM, ahammad wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an index with lots of different types of documents. One of those
> types basically contains extracts o
ave to look elsewhere to
fix the problem.
Anyone an idea what could cause the increasing warmup-Times? If required I can
post some stats.
Thanking you in anticipation!
Regards,
Sven
Feed: Solr-Mailing-List
Bereitgestellt am: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 09:05
Autor: Shalin Shekhar Manga
he increasing warmup-Times? If required I
> can post some stats.
>
>
>
> Thanking you in anticipation!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> Feed: Solr-Mailing-List
> Bereitgestellt am: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 09:05
> Autor: Shalin Shekhar Man
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Bohnsack, Sven wrote:
> Hey IT-Crowd!
>
> I'm dealing with some performance issues during warmup the
> queryResultCache. Normally it tooks about 11 Minutes (~700.000 ms), but
> now it tooks about 4 MILLION and more ms. All I can see in the solr.log
> ist that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
