Otis Gospodnetic-2 wrote:
>
> You may want to try the RPM tool, it will show you what inside of that
> QueryComponent is really slow.
>
We are already using it :)
Where should I be concentrating on? Transaction trace?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pefo
Otis Gospodnetic-2 wrote:
>
> Smaller merge factor will make things worse -
>
- Whoops... Ill guess Ill change it from 5 to the default 10
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Peformance-tuning-tp904540p905726.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
rom: Blargy
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, June 18, 2010 12:41:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Peformance tuning
>
>
Blargy - Please try to quote the mail you're responding to, at
> least
> the relevant piece. It's nice to see some context to
> the disc
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Blargy
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, June 18, 2010 1:22:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Peformance tuning
>
>
> first step is to do an &debugQuery=true and see where the
&
> first step is to do an &debugQuery=true and see where the time is
> going on the server-side. If you're doing highlighting of a stored
> field, that can be a biggie. The timings will be in the debug output
> - be sure to look at both sections of the timings.
>
Looks like the majori
Blargy - Please try to quote the mail you're responding to, at least
> the relevant piece. It's nice to see some context to the discussion.
No problem ;)
Depends - if you optimize the index on the master, then the entire index is
replicated. If you simply commit and let Lucene take care of
Blargy - Please try to quote the mail you're responding to, at least
the relevant piece. It's nice to see some context to the discussion.
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Blargy wrote:
Is there an alternative for highlighting on a large stored field?
Not currently.
I thought
for highlighting
Is there an alternative for highlighting on a large stored field? I thought
for highlighting you needed the field stored? I really just need the
excerpting feature for highlighting relevant portions of our item
descriptions.
Not sure if this is because of the index size (17.5G) or because of
high
first step is to do an &debugQuery=true and see where the time is
going on the server-side. If you're doing highlighting of a stored
field, that can be a biggie. The timings will be in the debug output
- be sure to look at both sections of the timings.
Erik
On Jun 17, 2010, at 9
