Re: Payloads in Solr

2008-04-09 Thread pgwillia
I started this thread back in November. Recall that I'm indexing xml and storing the xpath as a payload in each token. I am not encoding or mapping the xpath but storing the text directly as String.getBytes(). We're not using this to query in any way, just to add context to our search results.

Re: Payloads in Solr

2007-11-19 Thread Tricia Williams
Yonik Seeley wrote: http://www.nabble.com/Payload-API-tf4828837.html#a13815548 http://www.nabble.com/new-Token-API-tf4828894.html#a13815702 Thanks for these links. I didn't even realize you had started these conversations. Thank you! Tricia

Re: Payloads in Solr

2007-11-19 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I'm also wondering how others have accomplished this. Grant Ingersoll noted that one of the original use cases was XPath queries so I'm particularly interested in finding out if anyone has implemented that, and how. Me too. Any clarif

Re: Payloads in Solr

2007-11-18 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Nov 18, 2007 2:25 PM, Tricia Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your comments, Yonik! > > All for it... depending on what one means by "payload functionality" of > > course. > > We should probably hold off on adding a new lucene version to Solr > > until the Payload API has stabil

Re: Payloads in Solr

2007-11-18 Thread Tricia Williams
Thanks for your comments, Yonik! All for it... depending on what one means by "payload functionality" of course. We should probably hold off on adding a new lucene version to Solr until the Payload API has stabilized (it will most likely be changing very soon). It sounds like Lucene 2.3 is go

Re: Payloads in Solr

2007-11-17 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Nov 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Tricia Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering how Solr people feel about the inclusion of Payload > functionality in the Solr codebase? All for it... depending on what one means by "payload functionality" of course. We should probably hold off on adding