I started this thread back in November. Recall that I'm indexing xml and
storing the xpath as a payload in each token. I am not encoding or mapping
the xpath but storing the text directly as String.getBytes(). We're not
using this to query in any way, just to add context to our search results.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/Payload-API-tf4828837.html#a13815548
http://www.nabble.com/new-Token-API-tf4828894.html#a13815702
Thanks for these links. I didn't even realize you had started these
conversations.
Thank you!
Tricia
On Nov 18, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I'm also wondering how others have accomplished this. Grant
Ingersoll
noted that one of the original use cases was XPath queries so I'm
particularly interested in finding out if anyone has implemented
that,
and how.
Me too. Any clarif
On Nov 18, 2007 2:25 PM, Tricia Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your comments, Yonik!
> > All for it... depending on what one means by "payload functionality" of
> > course.
> > We should probably hold off on adding a new lucene version to Solr
> > until the Payload API has stabil
Thanks for your comments, Yonik!
All for it... depending on what one means by "payload functionality" of course.
We should probably hold off on adding a new lucene version to Solr
until the Payload API has stabilized (it will most likely be changing
very soon).
It sounds like Lucene 2.3 is go
On Nov 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Tricia Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering how Solr people feel about the inclusion of Payload
> functionality in the Solr codebase?
All for it... depending on what one means by "payload functionality" of course.
We should probably hold off on adding