Thx for these both, we'll give them both a try, see what difference they
make.
Upayavira
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, at 12:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Upayavira:
>
> bq: I would have expected that, because the data is being indexed
> concurrently across replicas, that the pattern of delete/merge woul
Upayavira:
bq: I would have expected that, because the data is being indexed
concurrently across replicas, that the pattern of delete/merge would be
similar across replicas.
Except for the pesky timing issue. The timers start for autocommit when a
request is received. So the time the autocommit t
Hello - your similarity should rely on numDoc instead, it solves the problem. I
believe it is already fixed in trunk, but i am not sure.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Upayavira
> Sent: Thursday 4th August 2016 13:59
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Out of sync deletions c
