Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Ed Summers
Thanks for the additional context and the pointers to STARTS. I realize solr-user is hardly a venue for discussing the details of OpenSearch so I'll refrain from commenting any further. I apologize for the harshness of my FUD comment. //Ed

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Walter Underwood
"FUD" is pretty strong language. I'll provide some context for my opinions. The year before OpenSearch came out, I'd designed and implemented a SOAP distributed search protocol to go across Ultraseek and Verity K2, so I was pretty familiar with heterogeneous search protocols, especially those that

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Ed Summers
On Nov 26, 2007 5:35 PM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > GData is really pretty useful. OpenSearch was just sloppy. Some element > names were capitalized, some weren't. A bunch of stuff specific to A9's > UI was mixed in. They insisted on using RSS in addition to Atom for a new > appl

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Bill Fowler
According to the guy in their booth, they support federated searches on engines that support OpenSearch (meaning you can use their federation tool to search content indexed by search engines that have an OpenSearch interface -- e.g., A9) but SearchServer '08 does NOT have an OpenSearch interface

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
Doesn't Microsoft push OpenSearch? http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/nov07/11-06SearchServer08ExpressPR.mspx Koji Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Ed, Wunder minght be right. As far as I know, only A9 was pushing OpenSearch. Now that A9 is not *really* around much, I think nobody is pushi

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Walter Underwood
one pushing GData either, other than Google, but Google is > doing rather (too?) well these days. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > - Original Message > From: Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apa

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Ed Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:15:54 AM Subject: Re: Opensearch XSLT On Oct 12, 2007 10:13 AM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-11-26 Thread Ed Summers
On Oct 12, 2007 10:13 AM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OpenSearch was a pretty poor design and is dead now, so I wouldn't > expect any new implementations. Google's GData (based on Atom) > reuses the few useful OpenSearch elements needed for things > like number of hits. Solr's Ato

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-10-12 Thread Bill Fowler
There is a file ${SOLR_HOME}/conf/xslt/example_rss.xsl which is easily modified to transform Solr's output to OpenSearch. Works great, though fixing the date format is a hassle. The supported, searchable Solr date format is not the OpensSearch standard. On 10/12/07, Robert Young <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Opensearch XSLT

2007-10-12 Thread Walter Underwood
There is a request handler in 1.2 for Atom. That might be close. OpenSearch was a pretty poor design and is dead now, so I wouldn't expect any new implementations. Google's GData (based on Atom) reuses the few useful OpenSearch elements needed for things like number of hits. Solr's Atom support re