m: Tom Hill [mailto:solr-l...@worldware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 2:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Odd query result
I agree that, if they are the same, you want to merge them.
In this case, I don't think you want them to be the same. In particular,
you
usually don
I agree that, if they are the same, you want to merge them.
In this case, I don't think you want them to be the same. In particular, you
usually don't want to catenateWords and catenateNumbers both index time AND
at query time. You generate the permutations on one, or the other, but you
don't need
It has nothing to do with your problem, since it seems to work when Tom
tested it.
However, it seems like you are using the same configurations on query- and
index-type analyzer.
If you did not hide anything from (for example own filter-implementations),
because you don't want to confuse us, you c
When I run it, with that fieldType, it seems to work for me. Here's a sample
query output
0
17
on
0
xtext:I-Car
2.2
10
ALLCAPS
I-CAR
CAMEL
I-Car
Did I miss something?
Could you show the output with debugQuery=on for the user's failing query?
Assuming I