RE: Odd query result

2010-04-20 Thread Charlie Jackson
m: Tom Hill [mailto:solr-l...@worldware.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 2:08 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Odd query result I agree that, if they are the same, you want to merge them. In this case, I don't think you want them to be the same. In particular, you usually don

Re: Odd query result

2010-04-20 Thread Tom Hill
I agree that, if they are the same, you want to merge them. In this case, I don't think you want them to be the same. In particular, you usually don't want to catenateWords and catenateNumbers both index time AND at query time. You generate the permutations on one, or the other, but you don't need

Re: Odd query result

2010-04-20 Thread MitchK
It has nothing to do with your problem, since it seems to work when Tom tested it. However, it seems like you are using the same configurations on query- and index-type analyzer. If you did not hide anything from (for example own filter-implementations), because you don't want to confuse us, you c

Re: Odd query result

2010-04-20 Thread Tom Hill
When I run it, with that fieldType, it seems to work for me. Here's a sample query output 0 17 on 0 xtext:I-Car 2.2 10 ALLCAPS I-CAR CAMEL I-Car Did I miss something? Could you show the output with debugQuery=on for the user's failing query? Assuming I