RE: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck

2019-11-25 Thread Moyer, Brett
This is a great help, thank you! Brett Moyer -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 4:12 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck If you’re using direct spell checking, it looks for the _indexed_ term. So this means

Re: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck

2019-11-25 Thread Erick Erickson
t; > Brett Moyer > > -Original Message- > From: Jörn Franke > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 8:34 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck > > Stemming involved ? > >> Am 22.11.2019 um 14:23 schrieb Moyer, Brett : >&

RE: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck

2019-11-25 Thread Moyer, Brett
Yes we are stemming, ahh so we shouldn't stem our words to be spelled? Brett Moyer -Original Message- From: Jörn Franke Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 8:34 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck Stemming involved ? > Am 22.11.2019

Re: Odd Edge Case for SpellCheck

2019-11-22 Thread Jörn Franke
Stemming involved ? > Am 22.11.2019 um 14:23 schrieb Moyer, Brett : > > Hello, we have spellcheck running, using the index as the dictionary. An odd > use case came up today wanted to get your thoughts and see if what we > determined is correct. Use case: User sends a query for q=brokerage, >