Mike,
I did only measurements by hand, i.e. no scientific figures yet. Basically
the same oov query takes about same amount of time when repeated. Which is
surprising. Ok, to add to the mix: from a list of fqs that are on that
query, one is marked with cache=false and a cost > 100.
Dmitry
On
It seems as if 0-hit queries should be pretty fast since they can
terminate very early? Are you seeing a big difference between
first-time and subsequent (cached) no-match queries?
-Mike
On 6/5/2014 8:47 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hi,
Solr is good at caching: even if first "cold" query takes lo
