use copyfield in your schema file. The copyfield takes its own
analyzer, so the original can fold and the copy may not.
dismax might help you at query time on this...
HTH
Erick
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:40 PM, HSingh wrote:
>
>
> : Usually people set up two fields, one with diacritics and one
: Usually people set up two fields, one with diacritics and one without.
: Then searches are against both fields. If you think a match against the
field
: with diacritics is more valuable, you can give that field a boost.
Hi Steve, where can one setup these two fields? Thank you for your k
o:hsin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 5:20 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Novice seeking help to change filters to search without
> diacritics
>
>
> Hi Steve, This is extremely helpful! What is the best way to also
> preserve/append the d
Hi Steve, This is extremely helpful! What is the best way to also
preserve/append the diacritics in the index in case someone searches using
them? I deeply appreciate your help!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Novice-seeking-help-to-change-filters-to-search
ce seeking help to change filters to search without
> diacritics
>
>
> Hoss, thank you for your helpful response!
>
> : i think what's confusing you is that you are using the
> : MappingCharFilterFactory with that file in your "text" field type to
> :
Hoss, thank you for your helpful response!
: i think what's confusing you is that you are using the
: MappingCharFilterFactory with that file in your "text" field type to
: convert any ISOLatin1Accent characters to their "base" characters
The problem is that a large range of characters are not g
: I am new to Solr and seeking your help to change filter from
: ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory to ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory files. I am not
According to the files you posted, you aren't using the
ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory -- so problem solved w/o making any changes.
: sure what change is to
