This is good idea
Thanks Alex.
On May 28, 2016 12:59 AM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch"
wrote:
> If you are worried about performance, bake the present/absent as a
> signal in a separate field during the document processing as a special
> UpdateRequestProcessor sequence.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> ---
If you are worried about performance, bake the present/absent as a
signal in a separate field during the document processing as a special
UpdateRequestProcessor sequence.
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 27 May
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for reply. i am also worried wither performance.
I will check if there is another way to design the documents in case of
parent and child relationship.
Regards,
Anil
On 27 May 2016 at 12:39, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/26/2016 11:13 PM, Anil wrote:
> > We have status text field
On 5/26/2016 11:13 PM, Anil wrote:
> We have status text field in our solr document and it is optional.
> search query status: !Closed returning documents with no status as
> well. how to get only documents having status and it is !Closed ? one
> way is status:* AND status:!Closed . any other way ?
thanks that helps
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NOT-operator-not-working-tp2365831p2389803.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
q=(sharp+AND+-deviceType:Access*)
that is not the query type of dismax for q operator (deviceType:Access*).
either you use as Filter query or write query like
q=(sharp AND -Access*)
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NOT-operator-not-worki
--- On Fri, 1/28/11, abhayd wrote:
> From: abhayd
> Subject: NOT operator not working
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Friday, January 28, 2011, 8:45 AM
>
> i have a field in xml file Accessory Data
> / Memory
> solr schema field declared as name="deviceType" type="text"
> indexe
