Thanks for all the help guys. You guys are awesome!
Peter: I wish I had the skill to be able to improve it. (and I will
try the patch :))
- Moazzam
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Peter Karich wrote:
> We use this in production since several months.
> So, try the patch and see if it is work
We use this in production since several months.
So, try the patch and see if it is working for you as expected, if not,
improve it :-)
Regards,
Peter.
> Do we know when it will be added? Are there any alternatives to Solr
> that do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Moazzam
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Do we know when it will be added? Are there any alternatives to Solr
that do this?
Thanks,
Moazzam
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> This is what Field Collapsing does. It is a complex feature and is not
> in the Solr trunk yet.
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Moazzam
This is what Field Collapsing does. It is a complex feature and is not
in the Solr trunk yet.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Moazzam Khan wrote:
> How would I do a facet search if I did this and not get duplicates?
>
> Thanks,
> Moazzam
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>>
How would I do a facet search if I did this and not get duplicates?
Thanks,
Moazzam
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> I think you need a 1:1 mapping between the consultant and the company, else
> how are you going to run your queries for let's say consultants that worked
> fo
I think you need a 1:1 mapping between the consultant and the company, else
how are you going to run your queries for let's say consultants that worked
for Google or AOL between March 1999 and August 2004?
If the mapping is 1:1, your life would be easier and you would not need to
do extra parsing
Thanks for the replies guys.
I am currently storing consultants like this ..
123
tony
marjo
Google
AOL
I have a few multi valued fields so if I do it the way Israel
suggested it, I will have tons of records. Do you think it will be
better if I did this instead ?
123
tony
marjo
And for 'present', you would pick some time far in the future:
2100-01-01T00:00:00Z
On 6/5/10, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> You need to make each document added to the index a 1 to 1 mapping for each
> company and consultant combo
>
>
>
>
>
> stored="true" required="true"/>
> stored="tru
You need to make each document added to the index a 1 to 1 mapping for each
company and consultant combo
text
1_1
Michael
Davis
AOL
2006-02-13T15:26:37Z
2008-02-13T15:26:37Z
1_4
Michael
Davis
Google
