: considering you're doing faceting on quite a few fields, the filterCache
: is somewhat important.
Sorry ... i overlooked the bit where QueryComponent was taking 6.x seconds
... in general knowing what the cache hit rates are looking like is
crucial to understanding the performance, but as Ry
Maybe i missed it, but skimming this thread i haven't seen any indication
of how your configured the various caches in solrconfig.xml ... or any
indication of what kinds of cache hit/miss/expullsion stats you see from
stats.jsp after running any tests.
considering you're doing faceting on quit
On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:11 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
w/ faceting qtime is around +200ms.
if your target time is 250, this will need some work... but lets
ignore that for now...
qtime for a standard query on the default search field is less than
100ms.
Usually around 60ms.
qtime for id: i
w/ faceting qtime is around +200ms.
qtime for a standard query on the default search field is less than 100ms.
Usually around 60ms.
qtime for id: is around 16ms.
ryantxu wrote:
>
>> -
>>
>> 6727.0
>> -
>>
>> 6457.0
>>
>> -
>>
>> 0.0
>>
>> -
>
> So I take it, this is with faceting t
-
6727.0
-
6457.0
-
0.0
-
So I take it, this is with faceting turned off...
what are your timing results for a simple (not dismax query), perhaps:
"id:"
ryan
yes I'm using 1.3
here are the contents of debug.. I'm only pasting the first explain since
the whole debug section is very long.
cleaning services
cleaning services
-
+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((about_us:cleaning^0.7 | zip:cleaning^0.7 |
(insurances:cleaners insurances:cleaning insurances:clean)
On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
and query times without faceting are... ?
solr's built in faceting is "simple" and has its limits. 15M is
higher than i've seen good faceting performance out of, particularly
multivalued fields.
Erik
Hi, My facet fields are multi valued
>and query times without faceting are... ?
>solr's built in faceting is "simple" and has its limits. 15M is
>higher than i've seen good faceting performance out of, particularly
>multivalued fields.
>
> Erik
Hi, My facet fields are multi valued and w/o faceting the query time is
about
On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
what is your actual query?
Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
I am doing faceting on 5 fields, no highlighting or anything else,
debugging
is also off. A basic query that I'm doing using dismax is 'cleaning
services' over
>what is your actual query?
>Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
I am doing faceting on 5 fields, no highlighting or anything else, debugging
is also off. A basic query that I'm doing using dismax is 'cleaning
services' over 15 million local business records.
--
View thi
what is your actual query?
Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
On Oct 8, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
Hi, thanks for responding so quickly,
6-12 seconds seems really long and 15 million docs is nothing on a
machine like this. Are you sure the issue is in Solr? How
One other question: are you using real query logs or a set of
unique queries? With real query logs, the caches will warm up
after a while (tens of minutes) and performance will improve.
With a set of unique queries, you are mostly measuring Solr
cache misses. For us, that is about 4X slower, and w
Hi, thanks for responding so quickly,
>6-12 seconds seems really long and 15 million docs is nothing on a
>machine like this. Are you sure the issue is in Solr? How are you
>measuring the 6-12 seconds?
I'm looking at the value in the Solr response.
>Assuming it is Solr...
>How often are
On Oct 8, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Rajiv2 wrote:
Hi, I need some recommendations w/ some issues I'm having w/ solr
search
performance.
Here is my index/hardware config:
- CentOS on 8 quad core xeon processors @ 3.16 Ghz
- 32 GB RAM
- Tomcat and JAVA 1.6
- Solr 1.3
~15 million documents .
- Index
I don't think you can search a 15 million doc index with any kind of
query complexity beyond a low freq query term in under .25 seconds
unless its a cached hit (in which case it still might not *quite* make
it under .25 every time either I'd think). Would love to be proven wrong
though You hav
15 matches
Mail list logo
