hey shawn i tried debugging actual solr code in local with the following two
different forms for frange. So to see if solr is somehow parsing it wrong.
But i seed the parsed query that gets put in the filter query pretty much
same.
query1 -> +_val_:{!frange cost=200 l=30 u=100 incl=true incu=false
1. a) is accurate while 2. b) is accurate.
if query 1. a) is just for example then its fine but otherwise usually want
to use filter on fields which has low cardinality like state, country,
gender etc. Name is a high cardinality column and using filter query
wouldn't be efficient and also doesn't
On 5/9/2018 12:56 PM, root23 wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation shawn. I will look at our autowarming time.
> Looking at your response i am thinking i might be doing few more things
> wrong
> 1. Does Must clause with any of the filter query makes any sense or is
> automatically implied.
> e.g i
Thanks for the explanation shawn. I will look at our autowarming time.
Looking at your response i am thinking i might be doing few more things
wrong
1. Does Must clause with any of the filter query makes any sense or is
automatically implied.
e.g if i want all the docs with firstName:michael and
On 5/8/2018 9:58 AM, root23 wrote:
> In case of frange query how do we specify the Must clause ?
Looking at how frange works, I'm pretty sure that all queries with
frange are going to be effectively single-clause. So you don't need to
specify MUST -- it's implied.
> the reason we are using frang
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the repsonse. We have multiple clauses. I was just giving an bare
bone example. Usually all our queries will have more then one clause.
In case of frange query how do we specify the Must clause ?
the reason we are using frange instead of the normal syntax is that we need
to a
On 5/7/2018 9:51 AM, manuj singh wrote:
> I am kind of confused how must clause(+) behaves with the filter queries.
> e.g i have below query:
> q=*:*&fq=+{!frange cost=200 l=NOW-179DAYS u=NOW/DAY+1DAY incl=true
> incu=false}date
>
> So i am filtering documents which are less then 179 old days.
> So
