Matt Weber schrieb:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
Thanks, Mark. Your explanation and the pointer to the Wiki have
clarified things for me.
Michael Ludwig
That's how we do it in Orbitz. We use "type" field to separate content, review
and promotional information in one single index. And then we use the
last-components to plugin these data together.
Only thing that we haven't yet tested is the scalability of this model, since
our data is small.
Th
1 - A field that is called "type" which is probably a string field
that you index values such as "people", "organization", "product".
2 - Yes, for each document you are indexing, you will include it's
type, ie. "person"
3, 4, 5 - You would have a core for each domain. Each domain will
th
Chris Masters schrieb:
- flatten the searchable objects as much as I can - use a type field
to distinguish - into a single index
- use multi-core approach to segregate domains of data
Some newbie questions:
(1) What is a "type field"? Is it to designate different types of
documents, e.g.
Chris,
1) I'd put different types of data in different cores/instances, unless you
relly need to search them all together. By using only common attributes
you are kind of killing the richness of data and your ability to do something
useful with it.
2) I'd triple-check the "do a second da
More precisely, we use a single core, flat schema, with a type field.
wunder
On 5/5/09 8:48 AM, "Walter Underwood" wrote:
> That is how we do it at Netflix. --wunder
>
> On 5/5/09 7:59 AM, "Chris Masters" wrote:
>
>> 1) Is this approach/design sensible and do others use it?
>
That is how we do it at Netflix. --wunder
On 5/5/09 7:59 AM, "Chris Masters" wrote:
> 1) Is this approach/design sensible and do others use it?
