: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:17:11 -0600
> Subject: Re: Many fields versus join
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Steven:
>
> Nope, I don't have any benchmarks off the top of my head.
>
> You could probably compare this pretty quic
given some things i read i suspect there
> are things to watch out for when defining so many fields (but then, not sure
> it 300 is a *big* number).
> thanks,steven
>
>> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:28:57 -0600
>> Subject: Re: Many fields versus join
>> From: erickerick...@g
elds) but given some things i read i suspect there
are things to watch out for when defining so many fields (but then, not sure it
300 is a *big* number).
thanks,steven
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:28:57 -0600
> Subject: Re: Many fields versus join
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To:
Join works best with a small number of unique values. Unfortunately,
people often want to join on , which is by definition
unique per document.
The usual advice is to first try to flatten your data as much as possible.
There's also some ongoing work on "block joins" that you may want to
look at th
