Thanks Shawn and Jack,
I changed solrconfig to set defaul query field (qf) to field content. It
works fine now.
Erol Akarsu
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/3/2012 1:44 PM, Erol Akarsu wrote:
>
>> I tried as search query not "baş" but "features:baş" in field "q" in
On 12/3/2012 1:44 PM, Erol Akarsu wrote:
I tried as search query not "baş" but "features:baş" in field "q" in SOLR
GUI. And, I got result!
In the one document, I had some fields type of text_eng, text_general and
one field features type of text_tr. If I don't specify field name, SOLR use
Engli
r use a "df" request
parameter or change the "df" default value for the request handler in the
solrconfig.xml.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 3:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR searc
rg.apache.solr.handler.**component.QueryComponent">
>>0.0
>>
>>> name="org.apache.solr.handler.**component.FacetComponent">
>>0.0
>>
>>> name=&q
type for "features", but probably not for the "text" field.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message----- From: Erol Akarsu
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:06 PM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different r
quot;, but probably not for the "text" field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results
Jack,
I have already set tomcat server fr
also reports for index analysis.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Erol Akarsu
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:35 AM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results
>
> Jack,
>
> Yes.
>
> I
for index analysis.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results
Jack,
Yes.
I expect SOLR should give same search results as Luked does.
ight the problem for you or not? Is the term analyzed
> as you expected?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> From: Erol Akarsu
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 8:44 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results
>
> Jack,
&
So, does that highlight the problem for you or not? Is the term analyzed as you
expected?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 8:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Luke and SOLR search giving different results
Jack,
Thanks for help.
I removed
Jack,
Thanks for help.
I removed data folder of SOLR and indexed this sample doc from scratch,
there was no document in SOLR but only one.
When I analysed , I can see stemming is correct and I can see these for
words "bul", "baş" ,"gör" and "umut" in SF row
I attached analyse screens
Erol Akar
Have you tried using the Solr Admin Analysis page, using the word and a few
words of context for index analysis and the word alone for query analysis?
And be sure to fully reindex if you change ANYTHING in the schema fields or
field types.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Sunday, Dec
12 matches
Mail list logo
