But I think Solr 3.6 is too far back to fall back to as I'm already using
Solr 5.1.
Regards,
Edwin
On 14 June 2015 at 14:49, Upayavira wrote:
> When in 2012? I'd give it a go with Solr 3.6 if you don't want to modify
> the library.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015, at 04:14 AM, Zheng Lin
When in 2012? I'd give it a go with Solr 3.6 if you don't want to modify
the library.
Upayavira
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015, at 04:14 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> I'm still trying to find out which version it is compatible for, but the
> document which I've followed is written in 2012.
>
> http://j
I'm still trying to find out which version it is compatible for, but the
document which I've followed is written in 2012.
http://java.dzone.com/articles/indexing-chinese-solr
Regards,
Edwin
On 12 June 2015 at 20:15, Upayavira wrote:
> Not knowing anything about paoding, it seems that this lib
Not knowing anything about paoding, it seems that this library isn't
compatible with the current version of Solr/Lucene. Have a look at the
version that it was compiled for. Having looked at the date of the
latest download (2008) Lucene has changed a LOT since then, so some
conversion work will def
