Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms

2009-12-04 Thread Erick Erickson
as Ahmet says, you need to re-index. Nothing about WordDelmiterFilterFactory alters case as far as I can tell from http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory Are you applying this in addition to the LowerCaseTokenizerFactory? In which case it's too

Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms

2009-12-04 Thread AHMET ARSLAN
> I have added >     class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" catenateAll="1" > /> > to both index and query but still getting same behaviour. > > Is there any other that i am missing? > Did you re-start tomcat and re-index? Why not use StandardTokenizerFactory?

Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms

2009-12-03 Thread con
I have added to both index and query but still getting same behaviour. Is there any other that i am missing? con wrote: > > Yes. I meant all the indexed documents. > > With debugQuery=on, i got the following result: > > > − > > 0 > 1 > − > > on > on > 0 > (phone:650 AND rowtyp

Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms

2009-12-03 Thread Erick Erickson
h, I don't think you want LowerCaseTokenizerFactory.. from: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory Creates org.apache.lucene.analysis.LowerCaseTokenizer. Creates tokens by lowercasing all letters and dropping non-letters. Example: "I can't"

Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms

2009-12-03 Thread con
Yes. I meant all the indexed documents. With debugQuery=on, i got the following result: − 0 1 − on on 0 (phone:650 AND rowtype:contacts) xml 1 2.2 − − 2009-09-22T06:50:36.943Z Adam a...@abc.com Adam smith en_US contacts − (phone:650 AND rowtype:contacts) (phone:650 AN

Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms

2009-12-03 Thread Erick Erickson
Hmmm, what does debugQuery=on show? And did you mean documents here? << it will return all the search terms>> Best Erick On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM, con wrote: > > Hi > > My solr deployment is giving correct results for normal search terms like > "john". > But when i search with "john55"