Re: Internal Solr communication question

2018-10-25 Thread Erick Erickson
preferLocalShards is a bit of a misnomer. I usually think of it as "don't go to another Solr node if possible". On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:46 AM Fernando Otero wrote: > > Thanks Emir! > I was already looking at preferLocalShards but I wasn't sure it'll help > with only 1 shard, I'll give it a

Re: Internal Solr communication question

2018-10-25 Thread Fernando Otero
Thanks Emir! I was already looking at preferLocalShards but I wasn't sure it'll help with only 1 shard, I'll give it a try On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:26 AM Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Fernando, > I did not look at code and not sure if there is special handling

Re: Internal Solr communication question

2018-10-25 Thread Emir Arnautović
Hi Fernando, I did not look at code and not sure if there is special handling in case of a single shard collection, but Solr does not have to choose local shard to query. It assumes that one node will receive all requests and that it needs to balance. What you can do is add preferLocalShards=tru

Re: Internal Solr communication question

2018-10-25 Thread Fernando Otero
Hey Shawn Thanks for your answer!. I changed the config to 1 shard with 7 replicas but I still see communication between nodes, is that expected? Each node has 1 shard so it should have all the data needed to compute, I don't get why I'm seeing communication between them. Thanks On Tue, Oct 2

Re: Internal Solr communication question

2018-10-23 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 10/23/2018 9:31 AM, Fernando Otero wrote: Hey all I'm running some tests on Solr cloud (10 nodes, 3 shards, 3 replicas), when I run the queries I end up seeing 7x traffic ( requests / minute) in Newrelic. Could it be that the internal communication between nodes is done through HTTP an