Thanks Eric and Shawn, appreciate your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-question-on-individual-field-update-tp4116605p4116831.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Update and add are basically the same thing if there's an existing document.
There will be some performance consequence since you're getting the stored
fields on the server as opposed to getting the full input from the external
source
and handing it to Solr. However, I know of at least one situatio
On 2/11/2014 2:37 PM, shamik wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for your reply. I should have given a better context. I'm currently
running an incremental crawl daily on this particular source and indexing
the documents. Incremental crawl looks for any change since last crawl date
based on the document publ
Ok, I was wrong here. I can always set the indextimestamp field with current
time (NOW) for every atomic update. On a similar note, is there any
performance constraint with updates compared to add ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-question-on-individ
Eric,
Thanks for your reply. I should have given a better context. I'm currently
running an incremental crawl daily on this particular source and indexing
the documents. Incremental crawl looks for any change since last crawl date
based on the document publish date. But, there's no way for me to
I'm assuming you're using the atomic update feature to
update the individual field, why not use it when you replace
the rest of the doc?
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Shamik Bandopadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently indexing a bunch of fields for a given document. For e.g.
>
you can do this with cores. You can have one core to serve the public,
and one for indexing. Then, when you've finished updating your index,
you use the core admin handler to swap the cores around. Then you do the
same thing the following night. Doesn't require any file moving nor any
restarts of s
Hello,
I do nightly builds for one of my sites. I build the new index in a
parallel directory. When it is finished I move the old files to a backup
directory(I only save one, delete the previous), move the new database
files to the correct place, then stop and restart solr. It sees the new
databas
Hi Ron,
If you turn off autoCommit and only commit after your delete and refresh,
the user's experience will be totally uninterrupted. Commits are used to
control visibility in a Solr index.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd
for all your responses so far!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:15 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Indexing Question for large dataset
>
> Is NAME a product name? W
Message-
From: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Indexing Question for large dataset
Is NAME a product name? Why would it be multivalue? And why would it appear
on more than one document? Is each
Is NAME a product name? Why would it be multivalue? And why would it appear
on more than one document? Is each 'document' a package of products? And
the pricing tiers are on the package, not individual pieces?
So sounds like you could, potentially, have a PriceListX column for each
user. As your
r all those
columns)?
Example Query:
q=name&fl=NAME,ID&facet=true&facet.field=PRICELIST500
Thanks,
Josh B.
-Original Message-
From: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing Ques
Indexing isn't a problem, it's just disk space and space is cheap. But, if
you do facets on all those price columns, that gets put into RAM which isn't
as cheap or plentiful. Your cache buffers may get overloaded a lot and
performance will suffer.
2000 price columns seems like a lot, could the doc
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:56 -0700, Mike Klaas wrote:
> On 5-Jul-07, at 11:43 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a document with a name field like this:
> > MP3-Player, Apple, »iPod nano«, silber,
> > 4GB
> >
> > and want to find "apple". Unfortunately, I only find "apple,"...
>
On 5-Jul-07, at 11:43 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
Hi all,
I have a document with a name field like this:
MP3-Player, Apple, »iPod nano«, silber,
4GB
and want to find "apple". Unfortunately, I only find "apple,"...
Can anybody help me with this?
Sure: you're using WhitespaceAnalyzer, which onl
16 matches
Mail list logo