: I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
I think you are missunderstanding the meaning of index time boosting vs
query time boosting.
First of all, this is not meaninful syntax in your schema.xml...
:
...there is no "boost" property that can be set on a in
Hi,
Have a look at http://search-lucene.com/?q=extendeddismax. Use "qf"
param in edismax to assign weights.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:19 AM, vsl wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
this is my request handler from solrconfig.xml:
explicit
10
text
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-field-boosting-tp4016010p4016049.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Can you show us the configuration for your request handler from
solrconfig.xml?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Oct 26, 2012 8:33 AM, "vsl" wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem with index time boosting. I created 4 new fields:
>
> stored="false"
> multiValue
Hi Ian. Thanks for buying my book.
The "boost" attribute goes on the field for the XML message you're sending to
Solr. In your example you mistakenly placed it in the schema.
FYI I use index time boosting as well as query time boosting. Although index
time boosting isn't something I can chan
esign :(
If you or anyone else here has any historical perspective on this, I'd
be interested to hear about it.
Regards,
Ian,
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 18 November 2009 22:55
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index-
Can "boost" attribute really be specified for a field in the schema? I wasn't
aware of that, and I don't see it on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml .
Maybe you are mixing it with
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22field.22
?
Otis
--
Sematext is hirin
