Re: How to keep a slave offline until the index is puller from master

: Thanks for the response. I was actually talking about the initial : sync over from the master. what I'd like I guess is a "lock" command : which would start true, and when snapinstaller ran successfully for : the first time would become false. I can write the bash, but I'm not : sure how to g

Re: How to keep a slave offline until the index is puller from master

t; Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > - Original Message >> From: Jacob Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:43:09 AM >> Subject: Re: How to keep a slave offl

Re: How to keep a slave offline until the index is puller from master

solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:43:09 AM > Subject: Re: How to keep a slave offline until the index is puller from master > > Hi Otis, > > Thanks for the response. I was actually talking about the initial > sync over from the master. what I'd

Re: How to keep a slave offline until the index is puller from master

Hi Otis, Thanks for the response. I was actually talking about the initial sync over from the master. what I'd like I guess is a "lock" command which would start true, and when snapinstaller ran successfully for the first time would become false. I can write the bash, but I'm not sure how to ge

Re: How to keep a slave offline until the index is puller from master

Even with your current setup (if it's done correctly) slavs should not be returning 0 hits for a query that previously returned hits. That is, nothing should be off-line. Index searcher warmup and swapping happens in the background and while that's happening the old searcher should be serving