RE: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-31 Thread Alex Wang
Thanks Noble Paul for the valuable tip. A servlet filter sounds like a great solution here. >-Original Message- >From: Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:29 AM >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >Subject: Re: Hijacking

Re: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
ent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:49 PM >>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>Subject: Re: Hijacking Search Requests >> >>I think this can be done with a load balancer such that you don't even >>need to go to Solr, right?  Or, do you mean you want different >>"

RE: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Alex Wang
Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] >Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:49 PM >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >Subject: Re: Hijacking Search Requests > >I think this can be done with a load balancer such that you don't even >need to go to Solr, right? Or, do you mean you w

Re: Hijacking Search Requests

2009-03-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I think this can be done with a load balancer such that you don't even need to go to Solr, right? Or, do you mean you want different "results" from Solr itself? On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Alex Wang wrote: Hi everyone, We have a web application that queries a Solr server through http.