I'm afraid there is no perfect solution for this problem, as you may always
have very long documents that will result in long response times, even with
a faster implementation (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268
).
The only way to avoid confusion for users and to ensure correct re
Nicolas Dessaigne wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you could use a copyfield with a maxChars limit as your
> highlighting field. Works well in my case.
>
Thanks for the tip. We did think about doing something similar (only
enabling highlighting for certain shorter fields) but we decided that
perhaps
Hi Andrew,
Alternatively, you could use a copyfield with a maxChars limit as your
highlighting field. Works well in my case.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538
Nicolas
2009/11/5 Andrew Clegg
>
>
> Indeed -- it actually went slightly slower but only by a few seconds, I
> suspec
It should be the same speed wither way for a term query. The
highlighted is going to be slow on general for a 1mb + doc. It
processes a token at a time. The fast vector highlighter is much
faster in those cases and should be in the next release. It handles
fewer query types though.
- Mark
: Has anyone else seen this sort of behaviour before? This is with a nightly
: from 2009-10-26.
have you tried hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false ? ...
http://old.nabble.com/Highlighting-performance-between-1.3-and-1.4rc-to26190790.html
...it doesn't seem like it should be affecting you for a simple
We're on 1.6 already. Any chance you could share your GC settings?
Thanks,
Andrew.
PS apologies for the duplicate message yesterday, Nabble threw an exception
when I posted the first one. And the second one actually.
Jaco-4 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had a similar case once (although not with t
Hi,
We had a similar case once (although not with those really long response
times). Fixed by moving to JRE 1.6 and tuning garbage collection.
Bye,
Jaco.
2009/11/3 Andrew Clegg
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm experimenting with highlighting for the first time, and it seems
> shockingly slow for some
