On 2/13/07, Ian Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/13/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, sorting by fields does take up memory (the fieldcache).
> 256M is pretty small for a 5M doc index.
> If you have any more memory slots, spring for some more memory (a
> little over $100 for
On 2/13/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, sorting by fields does take up memory (the fieldcache).
256M is pretty small for a 5M doc index.
If you have any more memory slots, spring for some more memory (a
little over $100 for 1GB).
Yeah, I'll see if I can give solr a bit more.
Yes, sorting by fields does take up memory (the fieldcache).
256M is pretty small for a 5M doc index.
If you have any more memory slots, spring for some more memory (a
little over $100 for 1GB).
Lucene also likes to have free memory left over available for OS cache
- otherwise searches start to
