Great, thank you !!!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hash-range-to-shard-assignment-tp4091204p4091889.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
That is in the pipeline. within next 3-4 months for sure
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:07 PM, lochri wrote:
> Yes, actually that would be a very comfortable solution.
> Is that planned ? And if so, when will it be released ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabbl
Yes, actually that would be a very comfortable solution.
Is that planned ? And if so, when will it be released ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hash-range-to-shard-assignment-tp4091204p4091591.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Custom routers is an idea that is floated around ad easy to implement.
Just that it is something we resist to add another extension point.
The point is we are planning other features which would obviate the
need for a custom router. Something like splitting a shard by a query.
Will it be a good en
Thanks for the clarification.
Still I would think it is sub-optimal to split shards when we actually don't
know which mailboxes we actually split. It may create splits of small users
which leads to unnecessary distribution of the smaller users.
We thought about doing the routing ourself. As far a
This would need you to plug your own router . It is not yet possible
But , you can split that shard repeatedly and keep the no:of users in that
shard limited
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:52 PM, lochri wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> we would like to have control of where certain hash values or ranges a
