Ah. I'll do some testing to see exactly how nodes function behaves when a
node links to itself.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:06 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > Am 07.06.2018 um 03:20 schrieb Joel Bernstein :
Hi,
> Am 07.06.2018 um 03:20 schrieb Joel Bernstein :
>
> Hi,
>
> At this time cycle detection is built into the nodes expression and cannot
> be turned off. The nodes expression is really designed to do a traditional
> breadth first search through a graph where cycle detection is needed so you
Hi,
At this time cycle detection is built into the nodes expression and cannot
be turned off. The nodes expression is really designed to do a traditional
breadth first search through a graph where cycle detection is needed so you
don't continually walk the same nodes.
Are you looking to do random
Everything working fine, these functional programming is amazing.
Thank you!
2017-10-31 12:31 GMT-02:00 Kojo :
> Thank you, I am just starting with Streaming Expressions. I will try this
> one later.
>
> I will open another thread, because I can´t do some simple queries using
> Streaming Expressi
Thank you, I am just starting with Streaming Expressions. I will try this
one later.
I will open another thread, because I can´t do some simple queries using
Streaming Expressions.
2017-10-30 12:11 GMT-02:00 Pratik Patel :
> You use this in query time. Since Streaming Expressions can be pipel
You use this in query time. Since Streaming Expressions can be pipelined,
the next stage/function of pipeline will work on the new tuples generated.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Kojo wrote:
> Do you store this new tuples, created by Streaming Expressions, in a new
> Solr cloud collection? O
Do you store this new tuples, created by Streaming Expressions, in a new
Solr cloud collection? Or just use this tuples in query time?
2017-10-30 11:00 GMT-02:00 Pratik Patel :
> By including Cartesian function in Streaming Expression pipeline, you can
> convert a tuple having one multivalued fie
By including Cartesian function in Streaming Expression pipeline, you can
convert a tuple having one multivalued field into multiple tuples where
each tuple holds one value for the field which was originally multivalued.
For example, if you have following document.
{ id: someID, fruits: [apple, o
Hi,
just a question, I have no deep background on Solr, Graph etc.
This solution looks like normalizing data like a m2m table in sql database,
is it?
2017-10-29 21:51 GMT-02:00 Pratik Patel :
> For now, you can probably use Cartesian function of Streaming Expressions
> which Joel implemented to
For now, you can probably use Cartesian function of Streaming Expressions
which Joel implemented to solve the same problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10292
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2017/03/streaming-nlp-is-coming-in-solr-66.html
Regards,
Pratik
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 7:38 P
I don't see a jira ticket for this yet. Feel free to create it and reply
back with the link.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Kojo wrote:
> Hi, I was looking for information on Graph Traversal. More specifically,
> support to search graph on multival
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:46 AM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Grant, can you describe your use case? Currently we can filter on the
> relationship using a filter query. So I was wondering what use case would
> involve retrieving the relationship. Are you looking to discover what
> relationships are av
Grant, can you describe your use case? Currently we can filter on the
relationship using a filter query. So I was wondering what use case would
involve retrieving the relationship. Are you looking to discover what
relationships are available? One of the assumptions I made was that users
would know
The other way to think about is: I want to put labels on the edges. In my
case, the label is the relationship, in your case, the label is the rating
or author.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:26 AM Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Grant Ingersoll
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 20
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:26 PM Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> In your example below it would be akin to injecting the rating onto those
> responses as well, not just in the 'fq'.
Gotcha... Yeah, I remember wondering how to do that myself.
-Yon
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:46 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Because the edges are unique on the subject->object there isn't currently a
> way to capture the relationship. Aggregations can be rolled up on numeric
> fields and as Yonik mentioned you can track the ancestor.
>
> It would be fairly easy t
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:26 PM Yonik Seeley wrote:
> You can get the nodes that to came from by adding trackTraversal=true
>
Yeah, I've tried that. It's not quite what I want. That just gets me the
"subject".
What I'm trying to do is more akin to what a triple store does.
I _can_ do things
Because the edges are unique on the subject->object there isn't currently a
way to capture the relationship. Aggregations can be rolled up on numeric
fields and as Yonik mentioned you can track the ancestor.
It would be fairly easy to track the relationship by adding a relationship
array that woul
You can get the nodes that to came from by adding trackTraversal=true
A cut'n'paste example from my Lucene/Solr Revolution slides:
curl $URL -d 'expr=gatherNodes(reviews,
search(reviews, q="user_s:Yonik AND rating_i:5",
fl="book_s,user_s,rating_i",sort="user_s asc"),
walk="book_s-
19 matches
Mail list logo
