The Linux file systems are generally at least twice as fast as the
Windows NTFS file system. Solr installations are mostly disk-limited
so this will have a major effect.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:53 PM, wojtekpia wrote:
>
> While Solr is functionally platform independent, I have seen much better
gt; > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 1:35:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: Google Commerce Search
> >
> > I was in your same shoes as yours. And did recommend and implement Solr
> to
> > my Fortune 10 client. Solr is a great solution and do
While Solr is functionally platform independent, I have seen much better
performance on Linux than Windows under high load (related to SOLR-465).
MitchK wrote:
>
> As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
> plattform-independent. ;)
> Learn more about Solr on http://www.luc
apache.org
> Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 1:35:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Google Commerce Search
>
> I was in your same shoes as yours. And did recommend and implement Solr to
> my Fortune 10 client. Solr is a great solution and does meet most of the
> requirements and lacks very few thi
Thanks for your frank analysis.
William Pierce-3 wrote:
>
> I have used solr extensively for our sites (and for the clients I work
> with). I think it is great! If you do an item-by-item feature list
> comparison, I think you will find that solr stacks up quite well. And
> the
> price, o
BTW: If you are looking for somebody to help you with Solr then you can
check the following wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Support
Rgds,
Lukas
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Pradeep Pujari wrote:
> Yes, all the points you mentioned can be easily done in Solr.
>
> Pradeep
>
> On Sun, Ja
Yes, all the points you mentioned can be easily done in Solr.
Pradeep
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:30 AM, mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> Our customer is a Fortune 5 big time company. They have millions of
> vendors/products they work with daily. They have budget for whatever we
> recommend but we like to us
Bill,
are you comparing percentage-rates or total numbers?
Keep in mind that Google own a big part of the traffic-cake.
Kind regards
Mitch
William Pierce-3 wrote:
>
> Let me give you an example from my own personal experience.We submit
> data feed of products from my clients to various s
I was in your same shoes as yours. And did recommend and implement Solr to
my Fortune 10 client. Solr is a great solution and does meet most of the
requirements and lacks very few things.
In your case, I think you should know that Solr does handle Synonyms very
well as long as they are single wor
I have used solr extensively for our sites (and for the clients I work
with). I think it is great! If you do an item-by-item feature list
comparison, I think you will find that solr stacks up quite well. And the
price, of course, cannot be beat!
However, there are a few intangibles that ma
As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
plattform-independent. ;)
Learn more about Solr on http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in
> hiring an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr
As you know, Solr is fully written in Java and Java is still
plattform-independent. ;)
Learn more about Solr on http://www.lucene.apache.org/solr
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in
> hiring an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up S
That sounds great. Could it also run on Windows? I am interested in hiring
an experienced Solr freelancer to help us set up Solr on Windows and
configure it to index our products. If anybody is interested please email
tmil...@ktait.com
Thank you!
MitchK wrote:
>
>
> mrbelvedr wrote:
>>
>> *
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> * Index our MS Sql Server 2008 product table
>
Yes. Have a look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq
mrbelvedr wrote:
>
> * Spell check for product brand names - user enters brand "sharpee" and
> the search engine will reply "Did you mean 'Sharpie'? "
>
14 matches
Mail list logo