Re: function query result without queryNorm

well…. I wanna boost new document but queryNorm makes me to hard to tune weight for bf score. > On Jul 8, 2015, at 1:48 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > But why do you want that? > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015, at 05:31 AM, Lee Chunki wrote: >> Hi Markus, >> >> Thank you for your reply. >> >> I have m

Re: function query result without queryNorm

But why do you want that? On Wed, Jul 8, 2015, at 05:31 AM, Lee Chunki wrote: > Hi Markus, > > Thank you for your reply. > > I have more questions. > > what I want to do is sort document by "tfidf score + function query > score” > > there are problems to do this : > > * if I use function que

Re: function query result without queryNorm

Hi Markus, Thank you for your reply. I have more questions. what I want to do is sort document by "tfidf score + function query score” there are problems to do this : * if I use function query ( https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery ), there i

RE: function query result without queryNorm

Hello - you can either use a similarity that does not use query normalization, or you can just ignore it, it is relative anyway. Also, consider using boost parameter instead of bf, it is multiplicative where bf is just additive, which offers less control. You may also want to reduce time resolut

Re: Function query result as a filter query

It's probably not exactly what you're looking for, but you can do ranges over functions in Solr 1.4 http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/07/06/ranges-over-functions-in-solr-14/ -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Pete Smith wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possi

Re: Function Query result

Thanks so much Umar! -Mike On 9-May-08, at 1:22 PM, Umar Shah wrote: Mike, as asked, I have added an example , hope it will be helpful to future users . thanks again. On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No problem. You can return the favour by cl

Re: Function Query result

Mike, as asked, I have added an example , hope it will be helpful to future users . thanks again. On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No problem. You can return the favour by clarifying the wiki example, > since it is publicly editable :). > > (It is hard

Re: Function Query result

No problem. You can return the favour by clarifying the wiki example, since it is publicly editable :). (It is hard for developers who are very familiar with a system to write good documentation for beginners, alas.) -Mike On 8-May-08, at 11:44 PM, Umar Shah wrote: thanks mike, some ho

Re: Function Query result

thanks mike, some how it was not evident from the wiki example, or i was too presumptious ;-). -umar On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7-May-08, at 11:40 PM, Umar Shah wrote: > >> >> >> That would be sufficient for my requirements, >> I'm using the fol

Re: Function Query result

On 7-May-08, at 11:40 PM, Umar Shah wrote: That would be sufficient for my requirements, I'm using the following query params q=*:* &_val_:function(blah, blah) &fl=*,score I'm not getting the value, value of score =1, am I missing something? Is that really what you are sending to Solr? The

Re: Function Query result

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7-May-08, at 5:01 AM, Umar Shah wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I want to use result of a function query based on multiple field values >> for >> ranking the results, >> can I also return the value of the computed function along

Re: Function Query result

On 7-May-08, at 5:01 AM, Umar Shah wrote: Hi, I want to use result of a function query based on multiple field values for ranking the results, can I also return the value of the computed function along with other fields of the documents returned. If you score documents based on a func