Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-23 Thread David Smiley @MITRE.org
Interesting. Do you have a reference (e.g. a patch, post, ...) to people actually doing this? The FieldCache seems like cheating because it's in-memory and there is a limited amount of memory, so for large data sets I have to wonder. Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: > > > On Mar 23, 2010, at 4:17 AM

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-23 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 22, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote: >> >> There a probably a lot of features already available in Solr out of the box > that most of those other "enterprise level" applications do not have yet. > > You would also be surprised to learn that a lot of them use Lucene under the > covers

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-23 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 23, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > On 2010-03-23 06:25, David Smiley @MITRE.org wrote: >> >> I use Endeca and Solr. >> >> A few notable things in Endeca but not in Solr: >> 1. Real-time search. > > >> 2. "related record navigation" (RRN) is what they call it. This is the

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-23 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On 2010-03-23 06:25, David Smiley @MITRE.org wrote: I use Endeca and Solr. A few notable things in Endeca but not in Solr: 1. Real-time search. 2. "related record navigation" (RRN) is what they call it. This is the ability to join in other records, something Lucene/Solr definitely can't do

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-22 Thread David Smiley @MITRE.org
I use Endeca and Solr. A few notable things in Endeca but not in Solr: 1. Real-time search. 2. "related record navigation" (RRN) is what they call it. This is the ability to join in other records, something Lucene/Solr definitely can't do. 3. A reference application for browsing/searching the da

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-22 Thread Lukáš Vlček
Hmm... sounds pretty much like what this book should be about (once finished): http://www.manning.com/ingersoll/ On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > About Text Analysis: "Natural Language Processing" is the more usual > term. Finding parts of speech, isolating people's names,

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-22 Thread Lance Norskog
About Text Analysis: "Natural Language Processing" is the more usual term. Finding parts of speech, isolating people's names, etc. On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > >> Web crawling. > > > I don't think Solr was designed

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-22 Thread Israel Ekpo
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > Web crawling. I don't think Solr was designed with Web Crawling in mind. Nutch would be more better suited for that, I believe. > Text analysis. > This is a bit vague. Please elaborate further. There is a lot of analysis (stemming, sto

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-22 Thread Lukáš Vlček
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > Web crawling. > Nutch, Lucene Conectors Framework... would it help to include this directly into Solr code base? > Text analysis. > Under development I think, see Mahout (check some proposed GSoC tickets in JIRA) > Distributed index ma

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-22 Thread Lance Norskog
Web crawling. Text analysis. Distributed index management. A fanatical devotion to the Pope. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:19 PM, MitchK wrote: > > Srikanth, > > I don't know anything about Endeca, so I can't compare Solr to it. > However, I know Solr is powerful. Very powerful. > So, maybe you shou

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-21 Thread MitchK
Srikanth, I don't know anything about Endeca, so I can't compare Solr to it. However, I know Solr is powerful. Very powerful. So, maybe you should tell us more about your needs to get a good answer. As a response to your second question: You should not expect that Solr is a database. It is an i

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-21 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:12:06 +0530 Srikanth B wrote: > Thanks but Im looking for answers on the functional and technical > front. [...] Yours is a very broad question, and the details of the answers probably depend on the domain that you are trying to use Solr in. Solr is extensively documented

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-21 Thread Srikanth B
Thanks but Im looking for answers on the functional and technical front. On 3/20/10, Israel Ekpo wrote: > > One feature that is not available in Solr is any licensing fees and fine > print. > > Also you should not expect to pay in order to use Solr. > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Srikanth

Re: Features not present in Solr

2010-03-20 Thread Israel Ekpo
One feature that is not available in Solr is any licensing fees and fine print. Also you should not expect to pay in order to use Solr. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Srikanth B wrote: > Hello > > We are in the process of researching on Solr features. I am looking for two > things >1