On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, smock wrote:
>
> As to point 1 - this is not a problem with the response structure I've
> outlined. This is exactly the problem I'm trying to solve. NULL is not a
> value in the field, it is a placeholder to indicate how many documents the
> field does not exist
As to point 1 - this is not a problem with the response structure I've
outlined. This is exactly the problem I'm trying to solve. NULL is not a
value in the field, it is a placeholder to indicate how many documents the
field does not exist for. In my example response structure above, 'missing'
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:20 AM, smock wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose a change to the facet response structure. Currently,
> it
> looks like:
>
> {'facet_fields':{'field1':[('value1',count1),('value2',count2),(null,missingCount)]}}
>
> My immediate problem with this structure is that null is not
