First - I completely agree with keeping the moving parts to a minimum - but
I do think that's a case by case decision, and in this particular case - it
may just be worth opening up a little.
Then - adding in a custom HttpClient may work - but HttpHeaders are set on
a request (and may differ from on
On 11/20/2013 3:28 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
The reason I needed access to internal details of the class - and it's not
just these 2 fields (I used these just as a quick example) - was that I was
trying to extend the class and overload the request method. As soon as I
tried to do that, I noticed
: The reason I needed access to internal details of the class - and it's not
: just these 2 fields (I used these just as a quick example) - was that I was
: trying to extend the class and overload the request method. As soon as I
: tried to do that, I noticed that I really couldn't easily do so -
The reason I needed access to internal details of the class - and it's not
just these 2 fields (I used these just as a quick example) - was that I was
trying to extend the class and overload the request method. As soon as I
tried to do that, I noticed that I really couldn't easily do so - because
m
On 11/20/2013 2:21 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
Quick question about the HttpSolrServer implementation - I would like to
extend some of the functionality of this class - but when I extend it - I'm
having issues with how extensible it is.
For example - some of the details are not visible externally
Will do - thanks for the quick feedback.
Eugen.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Feel free to file a JIRA issue with the changes you think make sense.
>
> - Mark
>
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Quick question about the HttpSolrServer
Feel free to file a JIRA issue with the changes you think make sense.
- Mark
On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
> Hi,
> Quick question about the HttpSolrServer implementation - I would like to
> extend some of the functionality of this class - but when I extend it - I'm
> havin