Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field

2011-10-14 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Can one configure (e)dismax to add tat + to 1 or more fields, like name : in that example, in order to require that clause though? Otis: this thread has fallen behind it's deja-vu brother in terms of useful information... http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/86a9202b97df441d/disma

Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field

2011-10-13 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
://search-lucene.com/ > >From: Chris Hostetter >To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" ; Otis >Gospodnetic >Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:57 PM >Subject: Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field > > >: Is there so

Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field

2011-10-12 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Is there some magic in edismax or one of the QPs that would make this possible: : : Boost documents which match name and desc; : include docs which just match name; : and exclude docs which only match desc. Isn't that pretty much the definition of... +name:foo^10 desc:foo ? If your

Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field

2011-10-12 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
, October 12, 2011 10:14 AM > Subject: Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field > > Otis: > > Hmmm, why doesn't a NOT clause only on desc work? > edismax allows fielded terms > > Best > Erick > >> >> Boost documents which match n

Re: Excluding docs from results based on matched field

2011-10-12 Thread Erick Erickson
Otis: Hmmm, why doesn't a NOT clause only on desc work? edismax allows fielded terms Best Erick > > Boost documents which match name and desc; > include docs which just match name; > and exclude docs which only match desc. > > > ? > > One could use very high field weight for name and very lo