Hi,
Can someone officially confirm that it is not supported by current Solr
version
to use both EmbeddedSolrServer(For Full indexing) and
StreamingUpdateSolrServer(For Incremental indexing )
to update the same index?
How can I request for enhancement in the next version?
I think that this requir
Hi Ryan,
I see.
Yes, for incremental indexing(Hourly) we use StreamingUpdateSolrServer
and it is faster than EmbeddedSolrServer.
We are also using, Embedded server for full indexing on a daily basis and
it is efficient for full indexing as it can handle large number of documents
in a better way.
In general -- i would not suggest mixing EmbeddedSolrServer with a
different style (unless the other instances are read only). If you
have multiple instances writing to the same files on disk you are
asking for problems.
Have you tried just using StreamingUpdateSolrServer for daily update?
I woul
Hi,
Any more thoughts??
Thanks,
PC Rao.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-and-StreamingUpdateSolrServer-tp3889073p3940383.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Mikhail Khludnev,
THank you for your help.
Let me explain you the scenario about JVM.
The JVM in which tomcat is running will not be restarted every time the
StreamingUpdateSolrServer
is running where as the EmbeddedSolrServer is a fresh JVM instance(new
process) every time.
In this scenario
To be honest I have no idea. Can you try to shutdown the first process JVM
after it's complete indexing and start second JVM only after that. Whether
it work?
which version of Solr you are running?
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, pcrao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any update?
> Thanks,
> PC Rao
>
> --
> Vi
Hi,
Any update?
Thanks,
PC Rao
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-and-StreamingUpdateSolrServer-tp3889073p3925014.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Mikhail Khludnev,
You are partially right. i.e. We have two separate processes accessing the
same Lucene Directory
but they do not run simultaneously. They run one after the other and only
after the first one is
completed. The commit from the EmbeddedServer is successful and I am posting
the lo
Did I get right that you have two separate processes (different app) access
the same LuceneDIrectory simultaneously? In this case I suggest to read
about Locking mechanism. I'm not really experienced in it.
You showed logs from StrUpdHandler failure, it's clear. Can you show logs
from Embeded serve
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
Mikhail Khludnev, what do you think of Shawn's opinion?
Thanks,
PC Rao.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-and-StreamingUpdateSolrServer-tp3889073p3907223.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
On 4/12/2012 4:52 AM, pcrao wrote:
I think the index is getting corrupted because StreamingUpdateSolrServer is
keeping reference
to some index files that are being deleted by EmbeddedSolrServer during
commit/optimize process.
As a result when I Index(Full) using EmbeddedSolrServer and then do
Inc
Hi Mikhail Khludnev,
Thank you for the reply.
I think the index is getting corrupted because StreamingUpdateSolrServer is
keeping reference
to some index files that are being deleted by EmbeddedSolrServer during
commit/optimize process.
As a result when I Index(Full) using EmbeddedSolrServer and t
Hi,
it's hard to help until you tell us why you think that index is corrupted.
Logs&steps&stacktraces are useful.
Regards
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:56 PM, pcrao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any update on this?
> Please let me know if you need additional information on this.
>
> Thanks,
> PC Rao.
>
> --
>
Hi,
Any update on this?
Please let me know if you need additional information on this.
Thanks,
PC Rao.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/EmbeddedSolrServer-and-StreamingUpdateSolrServer-tp3889073p3902171.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Na
14 matches
Mail list logo
