On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 15:41, gdeconto wrote:
>
>
> Xavier Schepler wrote:
>>
>> for example, "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users
>> using this feature.
>>
>
> I've done tests with many hundred dynamically created fields (ie foo_1 thru
> f_400). generally speaking, I have
Xavier Schepler wrote:
>
> for example, "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users
> using this feature.
>
I've done tests with many hundred dynamically created fields (ie foo_1 thru
f_400). generally speaking, I havent noticed any noticeable performance
issues from having t
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
>> xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
>>>
>>> I n
Shalin Shekhar Mangar a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
Hey,
I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
"concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 use
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Xavier Schepler <
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm thinking about using dynamic fields.
>
> I need one or more user specific field in my schema, for example,
> "concept_user_*", and I will have maybe more than 200 users using this
> feature.
> O