On 3/2/2015 6:12 AM, tuxedomoon wrote:
> Shawn, in light of Garth's response below
>
> "You can't just add a new core to an existing collection. You can add the
> new node to the cloud, but it won't be part of any collection. You're not
> going to be able to just slide it in as a 4th shard to an
Shawn, in light of Garth's response below
"You can't just add a new core to an existing collection. You can add the
new node to the cloud, but it won't be part of any collection. You're not
going to be able to just slide it in as a 4th shard to an established
collection of 3 shards."
how is it
I'd forgotten that DzkHost refers to the Zookeeper hosts not SOLR hosts.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Does-shard-splitting-double-host-count-tp4189595p4189703.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
a new collection for the next set. Keep
the query alias updated to span the collections you're interested in.
-Original Message-
From: tuxedomoon [mailto:dancolem...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:43 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does shard splitting doub
On 2/27/2015 11:42 AM, tuxedomoon wrote:
> What about adding one new leader/replica pair? It seems that would entail
>
> a) creating the r3.large instances and volumes
> b) adding 2 new Zookeeper hosts?
> c) updating my Zookeeper configs (new hosts, new ids, new SOLR config)
> d) restarting all ZK
What about adding one new leader/replica pair? It seems that would entail
a) creating the r3.large instances and volumes
b) adding 2 new Zookeeper hosts?
c) updating my Zookeeper configs (new hosts, new ids, new SOLR config)
d) restarting all ZKs
e) restarting SOLR hosts in sequence needed for co
On 2/27/2015 7:15 AM, tuxedomoon wrote:
> I currently have a SolrCloud with 3 shards + replicas, it is holding 130M
> documents and the r3.large hosts are running out of memory. As it's on 4.2
> there is no shard splitting, I will have to reindex to a 4.3+ version.
>
> If I had that feature would
Well, if you're going to reindex on a newer version, just start out with the
number of shards you feel is appropriate, and reindex.
But yes, if you had 3 shards, wanted to split some of them, you'd really
have to split all of them (making 6), if you wanted the shards to be about
the same size.
As
