e.org
Subject: RE: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
Which is why the positionIncrementGap is set to a high number normally (100 in
the sample schema.xml). With this being so, phrases won't match accross values
in a multi-valued field. If for some reason you were using a dismax ps ph
n
>
> Jason.
>
> ____
>
> From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
> Sent: Tue 19/10/2010 17:27
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
>
>
>
> You are correct. The quer
;
> From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
> Sent: Tue 19/10/2010 17:27
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
>
>
>
> You are correct. The query needs to match as a phrase. It doesn't need
> to match "ev
...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Tue 19/10/2010 17:27
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
You are correct. The query needs to match as a phrase. It doesn't need
to match "everything". Note that if a value is:
"long sentence with my blue rabbit
You are correct. The query needs to match as a phrase. It doesn't need
to match "everything". Note that if a value is:
"long sentence with my blue rabbit in it",
then query "my blue rabbit" will also match as a phrase, for phrase
boosting or query purposes.
Jonathan
Jason Brown wrote:
H
