maybe you can read http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin
2011/7/19 Ahmet Arslan
> > >
> > > q=test~0.8
> > >
> >
> > do you add ~0.8 in the query (http) or in the
> > solrconfig.xml (like > name="q">field~0.8)?
>
> mostly in the http.
>
> > is "test" the fieldName or a search string?
> >
> > q=test~0.8
> >
>
> do you add ~0.8 in the query (http) or in the
> solrconfig.xml (like name="q">field~0.8)?
mostly in the http.
> is "test" the fieldName or a search string?
search string. Do you have another use case?
iorixxx wrote:
>
> q=test~0.8
>
do you add ~0.8 in the query (http) or in the solrconfig.xml (like field~0.8)?
is "test" the fieldName or a search string?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dismax-RequestHandler-adn-Fuzzy-Search-tp3178747p3179643.html
Sent
> I tried this in qf parameter (fieldname~0.8^2) but have
> still the same
> problem: no results
Okey it is not qf nor pf. Just plain q parameter. q=test~0.8
iorixxx wrote:
>
> What is your purpose of using it in pf parameter?
>
I don't know. I have seen it somewhere and i thought it has to be in the pf
parameter.
iorixxx wrote:
>
> edismax enables fuzzy search but you should use that tilde sing in q
> parameter.
>
I tried this in qf parameter (
> thanks for your answer!
>
> I tried to add the following line to the solrconfig.xml
> file:
> fieldName~0.8
>
> Before adding the line I got 14 results for a request.
> After adding the line
> (and restarting solr) I did the same request and changed
> just one letter of
> the string. I was expe
thanks for your answer!
I tried to add the following line to the solrconfig.xml file:
fieldName~0.8
Before adding the line I got 14 results for a request. After adding the line
(and restarting solr) I did the same request and changed just one letter of
the string. I was expecting that I have to g
> Hi!
> I would like to implement a fuzzy search with the Dismax
> Request Handler.
> I noticed that there are some discussions about that, but
> all from the year
> 2009. (adding ~ in solrconfig)
>
> Is it still at the same state or may be already
> implemented?
It is already implemented. https:
