It turns out that Solr 3.5.0 does not have the dismax issue, so, we have
reverted. Hopefully, the bug will be fixed.
From: Joel Rosen
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Cc: Ahmet Arslan ; Tom Burton-West
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 10:31 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>I and another user recently posted about this exact same issue. It sounds
>like maybe this is a
From: Joel Rosen
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Cc: Ahmet Arslan ; Tom Burton-West
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 10:31 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>
>I and another user recently posted about this exact same issue. It sounds
>like maybe this is a
, Steve Fatula wrote:
>
> >From: Ahmet Arslan
> >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
> >Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 6:22 AM
> >Subject: Re: Dismax Question
> >
> >> So, my question is how do we get Solr search to work with
> >> AND when
>From: Ahmet Arslan
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 6:22 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>> So, my question is how do we get Solr search to work with
>> AND when it is splitting words? The splitting part is good,
&g
>From: Vadim Kisselmann
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 4:31 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>in your schema.xml you can set the default query parser operator, in
>your case , but it's
>deprecated.
>
>
>I
in your schema.xml you can set the default query parser operator, in
your case , but it's
deprecated.
When you use the edismax, read this:http://drupal.org/node/1559394 .
mm-param is here the answer.
Best regards
Vadim
2012/7/2 Steve Fatula :
> Let's say a user types in:
>
> DualHead2Go
>
>
>
> So, my question is how do we get Solr search to work with
> AND when it is splitting words? The splitting part is good,
> the bad part is that it is searching for any one of those
> split words.
Setting autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true" and &mm=100% might help you.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
: > Deja-Vu...
:
: >
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/3551f130b6772799/excluding_docs_from_results_based_on_matched_field
:
: > -Hoss
:
: Thanks for the answer, the problem is that the query like this:
:
: q=foo&defType=dismax&qf=title&bq={!dismax qf='title desc' v=$q}
:
: cau
Hello!
> : I've got a problem and maybe someone had a similar one ;) I want to
> : 'force' dismax to make a query like the following one:
> : +title:foo^100 desc:foo
> :
> : The name and desc fields are only an exmaple, there can be a multiple
> : fields that lay under the name of 'title' and 'de
: I've got a problem and maybe someone had a similar one ;) I want to
: 'force' dismax to make a query like the following one:
: +title:foo^100 desc:foo
:
: The name and desc fields are only an exmaple, there can be a multiple
: fields that lay under the name of 'title' and 'desc'.
:
: What I tr
: but no results for:
: qt=dismax&q= blabla
:
^1.5&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&indent=on&fl=*,score&debugQuery=true&sort=length_seconds+desc
:
: doesn't DisMax support term boosting?
the dismax syntax is specifically very limited to match the common
assumptions end users have about search input ..
Thanks, that did the trick but now i have another problem (the
documentation is very little).
It fails when i try to boost terms in the query, i.e.
I get results for :
qt=dismax&q=blabla&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&indent=on&fl=*,score&debugQuery=true&sort=length_seconds+desc
but no results for:
: When i run my query with qt=dismax i don't get results:
:
: /solr/select/?qt=dismax&q=blablabla%3BRelevanc
: +desc&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&indent=on&fl=*,score
:
: when i remove the qt=dismax i do get result back:
:
: /solr/select/?q=blablabla%3BRelevanc
: +desc&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1&ind
14 matches
Mail list logo
