Re: Disk Usage anomoly across shards/replicas

2016-03-06 Thread Robert Brown
There was only one single index dir, after taking a node down, another was created with the timestamp, so I know what you mean, but then the original was removed. I've since replaced the node and all is well again, just very odd. On 06/03/16 06:52, Varun Thacker wrote: Hi Robert, Within t

Re: Disk Usage anomoly across shards/replicas

2016-03-05 Thread Varun Thacker
Hi Robert, Within the shard directory there should be multiple directories - "tlog" "index." . Do you see multiple "index.*" directories in there for the shard which has more data on disk? On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Robert Brown wrote: > Hi, > > I have an index with 65m docs spread across

Re: Disk Usage anomoly across shards/replicas

2016-03-05 Thread Robert Brown
Thanks Shawn, I'm just about to remove that node and rebuild it, at least there won't be any actual downtime. On 05/03/16 14:44, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 3/5/2016 6:09 AM, Robert Brown wrote: I have an index with 65m docs spread across 2 shards, each with 1 replica. The replica1 of shard2 i

Re: Disk Usage anomoly across shards/replicas

2016-03-05 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 3/5/2016 6:09 AM, Robert Brown wrote: > I have an index with 65m docs spread across 2 shards, each with 1 > replica. > > The replica1 of shard2 is using up nearly double the amount of disk > space as the other shards/replicas. I *very* occasionally see some of the shards in my non-SolrCloud ind

Re: Disk Usage anomoly across shards/replicas

2016-03-05 Thread Robert Brown
Nope, we never run optimise. Would there be some tell-tale files in the index dir to indicate if someone else had ran an optimise? On 05/03/16 13:11, Binoy Dalal wrote: Have you executed an optimize across that particular shard? On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, 18:39 Robert Brown, wrote: Hi, I have

Re: Disk Usage anomoly across shards/replicas

2016-03-05 Thread Binoy Dalal
Have you executed an optimize across that particular shard? On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, 18:39 Robert Brown, wrote: > Hi, > > I have an index with 65m docs spread across 2 shards, each with 1 replica. > > The replica1 of shard2 is using up nearly double the amount of disk > space as the other shards/repl