On 11/09/2007, at 9:48 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
try: ulimit -n
ulimit on its own is something else. On my machine I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ulimit
unlimited
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
364770
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ulimit -n
1024
I have to run:
ulimit -n 2
to get luce
I've done a bit of poking on the server and ulimit doesn't seem to be
the problem:
e2wiki:~$ ulimit
unlimited
e2wiki:~$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
170355
try: ulimit -n
ulimit on its own is something else. On my machine I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ulimit
unlimited
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /
On 11/09/2007, at 8:46 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
lucene opens a lot of files. It can easily get beyond 1024. (I
think the default). I'm no expert on how the file handling works,
but I think more files are open if you are searching and writing at
the same time.
If you can't increase the li
Adrian Sutton wrote:
On 11/09/2007, at 7:21 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
The other problem is that after some time we get a "Too Many Open
Files" error when autocommit fires.
Have you checked your ulimit settings?
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-48921635adf2c968f7936dc07d51dfb4
On 11/09/2007, at 7:21 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
The other problem is that after some time we get a "Too Many Open
Files" error when autocommit fires.
Have you checked your ulimit settings?
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/
LuceneFAQ#head-48921635adf2c968f7936dc07d51dfb40d638b82
ulimit -
The other problem is that after some time we get a "Too Many Open Files"
error when autocommit fires.
Have you checked your ulimit settings?
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-48921635adf2c968f7936dc07d51dfb40d638b82
ulimit -n .
As mike mentioned, you may also want to use 's
On Sep 10, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 10-Sep-07, at 1:50 PM, Adrian Sutton wrote:
We use DirectSolrConnection via JNI in a couple of client apps
that sometimes have 100s of thousands of new docs as fast as Solr
will have them. It would crash relentlessly if I didn't force all
On 10-Sep-07, at 1:50 PM, Adrian Sutton wrote:
We use DirectSolrConnection via JNI in a couple of client apps
that sometimes have 100s of thousands of new docs as fast as Solr
will have them. It would crash relentlessly if I didn't force all
calls to update or query to be on the same thread
On 9/10/07, Adrian Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can Solr as a web app handle multiple updates at
> once or does it synchronize to avoid it?
Yep... things aren't synchronized at the top level and are designed to
be thread-safe.
-Yonik
We use DirectSolrConnection via JNI in a couple of client apps that
sometimes have 100s of thousands of new docs as fast as Solr will
have them. It would crash relentlessly if I didn't force all calls
to update or query to be on the same thread using objc's
@synchronized and a message queue
On Sep 10, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Adrian Sutton wrote:
After a while we start getting exceptions thrown because of a
timeout in acquiring write.lock. It's quite possible that this
occurs whenever two updates are attempted at the same time - is
DirectSolrConnection intended to be thread safe?
11 matches
Mail list logo