Re: Difference in q.op param behavior between Solr 6.3 and Solr 8.5.2

2020-09-28 Thread gnandre
Thanks, this is helpful. I agree. q.op param should not affect fq parameter. I think this is a feature and not a bug. On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:39 PM Erik Hatcher wrote: > In 6.3 it did that? It shouldn't have. q and fq shouldn't share > parameters. fq's themselves shouldn't, IMO, have globa

Re: Difference in q.op param behavior between Solr 6.3 and Solr 8.5.2

2020-09-23 Thread Erik Hatcher
In 6.3 it did that? It shouldn't have. q and fq shouldn't share parameters. fq's themselves shouldn't, IMO, have global defaults. fq's need to be stable and often uniquely specified kinds of constraining query parsers ({!terms/term/field,etc}) or rely on basic Lucene query parser syntax and

Re: Difference in q.op param behavior between Solr 6.3 and Solr 8.5.2

2020-09-23 Thread gnandre
Is there a way to set default operator as AND for fq parameter in Solr 8.5.2 now? On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:44 PM gnandre wrote: > In 6.3, q.op param used to affect q as well fq param behavior. E.g. if > q.op is set to AND and fq is set to id:(1 2 3), no results will show up but > if it is set t