index" within the same index dir.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:40:52 PM
Subject: Re: Delete entire index
>> :
>> : Actually, it's not quite equivalent if there wa
On 6/13/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> :
>> : Actually, it's not quite equivalent if there was a schema change.
>> : There are some "sticky" field properties that are per-segment global.
>> : For example, if you added omitNorms="true" to a field, then did
>>
>> Hmmm... I thought
:
: Actually, it's not quite equivalent if there was a schema change.
: There are some "sticky" field properties that are per-segment global.
: For example, if you added omitNorms="true" to a field, then did
Hmmm... I thought the optimize would take care of that?
Oh yes, sorry, I was thinking a
On 6/13/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > correct ... deleting *:* followed by doing an should be
: > functionally equivilent to stoping the servlet container, removing the
: > directory and starting the sorl container ... but it won't be quite as
: > efficient.
:
: Actually, it
On 6/13/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I could be wrong, but I think you can send a "delete by query" syntax:
: *:*
correct ... deleting *:* followed by doing an should be
functionally equivilent to stoping the servlet container, removing the
directory and starting the sorl c
: > correct ... deleting *:* followed by doing an should be
: > functionally equivilent to stoping the servlet container, removing the
: > directory and starting the sorl container ... but it won't be quite as
: > efficient.
:
: Actually, it's not quite equivalent if there was a schema change.
: T
: I could be wrong, but I think you can send a "delete by query" syntax:
: *:*
correct ... deleting *:* followed by doing an should be
functionally equivilent to stoping the servlet container, removing the
directory and starting the sorl container ... but it won't be quite as
efficient.
if some
I agree... and the fix really belongs at the Lucene level:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-932
-Yonik
On 6/13/07, Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to have Solr completely remove the current index?
?
We're still in development and so our schema is waveri
Matt,
I could be wrong, but I think you can send a "delete by query" syntax:
*:*
--
Thiago Jackiw
acts_as_solr => http://acts-as-solr.railsfreaks.com
On 6/13/07, Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to have Solr completely remove the current index?
?
We're still in de
