Well, that's just the way Solr works. You can tune the range
performance by playing with the prescisionStep, Trie
fields are built to make range queries perform well.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:20 AM, vybe3142 wrote:
> ... Inelegant as opposed to the possibility of using /DAY to speci
... Inelegant as opposed to the possibility of using /DAY to specify day
granularity on a single term query
In any case, if that's how SOLR works, that's fine
Any rough idea of the performance of range queries vs truncated day queries?
Otherwise, I might just write up a quick program to compare t
The only way to get more "elegant" would be to
index the dates with the granularity you want, i.e.
truncate to DAY at index time then truncate
to DAY at query time as well.
Why do you consider ranges inelegant? How else
would you imagine it would be done?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:07
Also, what's the performance impact of range queries vs. querying for a
particular DAY (as described in my last post) when the index contains ,
say, 10 million docs ?
If the range queries result in a significant performance hit, one option for
us would be to define additional DAY fields when inde
Thanks
So , I tried out the suggestions. I used the main query though (not a
filter)
1. Using a DATE range and DAYdoes give me the desired results.
Specifically, the query that I used was
2. Without a DATE range, the parser seems to reduce the date to the
beginning of the day i.e. 00:00:00 and a
If Peter's suggestion doesn't work, please post the results
of adding &debugQuery=on to your query. The date math
stuff is sensitive to spaces, for instance and it's impossible
to tell whether you're making a simple error like that without
seeing what you're actually doing.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Apr
you could use a filter query like: fq=datefield:[NOW/DAY-1DAY TO
NOW/DAY+1DAY]
*replace datefield with your field that contains the time info
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, vybe3142 wrote:
> A query search on a particular date:
>
> returns 1valid result (as expected).
>
> How can I alter the
