Hi, all
Thanks for your responses.
I'd tried
[NOW/DAY-30DAY+TO+NOW/DAY-1DAY-1SECOND]
and seems it works fine for me.
Thanks a lot!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Date-filter-query-tp3764349p3766139.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
bq: How could I overlook it?
Easy, the same way I did for a year and more
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Em wrote:
> Erick,
>
> damn!
>
> The NOW of now isn't the same NOW a second later. So obvisiously. How
> could I overlook it?
>
> Kind regards,
> Em
>
> Am 22.02.2012 00:17
Erick,
damn!
The NOW of now isn't the same NOW a second later. So obvisiously. How
could I overlook it?
Kind regards,
Em
Am 22.02.2012 00:17, schrieb Erick Erickson:
> Be a little careful here. Any "fq" that references NOW will probably
> NOT be effectively cached. Think of the fq cache as a ma
Be a little careful here. Any "fq" that references NOW will probably
NOT be effectively cached. Think of the fq cache as a map, with
the key being the fq clause and the value being the set of
documents that match that value.
So something like NOW gives
2012-01-23T00:00:00Z
but issuing that a secon
Hi,
> But they [the cache configurations] are default for both tests, can it
affect on
> results?
Yes, they affect both results. Try to increase the values for
queryResultCache and documentCache from 512 to 1024 (provided that you
got two distinct queries "bay" and "girl"). In general they should
Hi,
>>First: I am really surprised that the difference between explicit
>>Date-Values and the more friendly date-keywords is that large.
Maybe it is that I use shards. I have 11 shards, summary ~310M docs.
>>Did you made a server restart between both tests?
I tried to run these test one after a
Hi,
your QTimes are somewhat slow!
First: I am really surprised that the difference between explicit
Date-Values and the more friendly date-keywords is that large.
Did you made a server restart between both tests?
Second: Could you show us your solrconfig to make sure that your caches
are configu
Hi, Em, thanks for your response. But seems a have a problem.
I wrote a script, which sends a queries (curl based), with a certain delay.
I had made a dictionary of matched words. I run my script with 500ms delay
during 60 seconds. Take look at catalina logs:
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
par
Hi,
1) and 2) should have equal performance, given that several searches are
performed with the same fq-param.
Since the filters are cached, 1) and 2) perform better.
Kind regards,
Em
Am 21.02.2012 19:06, schrieb ku3ia:
> Hi all!
>
> Please advice me:
> 1) q=test&fq=date:[NOW-30DAY+TO+NOW]
> 2
