On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM, amitj wrote:
>
> Is there also a way we can include some kind of annotation on the schema
> field and send the data retrieved for that field to an external application.
> We have a requirement where we require some data fields (out of the fields
> for an entity def
Is there also a way we can include some kind of annotation on the schema
field and send the data retrieved for that field to an external application.
We have a requirement where we require some data fields (out of the fields
for an entity defined in data-config.xml) to act as entities for entity
e
writing to a remote Solr through SolrJ is in the cards. I may even
take it up after 1.4 release. For now your best bet is to override the
class SolrWriter and override the corresponding methods for
add/delete.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> I do remember LuSQL and a discus
I do remember LuSQL and a discussion regarding the performance implications
of using it compared to the DIH. My only reason to stick with DIH is that we
may have other data sources for document loading in the near term that may
make LuSQL too specific for our needs.
Regarding the bug to write to t
Amit,
You might want to take a look at LuSql[1] and see if it may be
appropriate for the issues you have.
thanks,
Glen
[1]http://lab.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cistilabswiki/index.php/LuSql
2009/4/27 Amit Nithian :
> All,
> I have a few questions regarding the data import handler. We have some
there is an issue already to write to the index in a separate thread.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1089
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
>
>> All,
>> I have a few questions regarding the data impor
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> All,
> I have a few questions regarding the data import handler. We have some
> pretty gnarly SQL queries to load our indices and our current loader
> implementation is extremely fragile. I am looking to migrate over to the
> DIH; however, I
