Erick Erickson wrote
> Have you considered using SolrJ instead of DIH? I've seen
> situations where that can make a difference for things like
> caching small tables at the start of a run, see:
>
> searchhub.org/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Nice write-up. I think we're going to move to that ev
Have you considered using SolrJ instead of DIH? I've seen
situations where that can make a difference for things like
caching small tables at the start of a run, see:
searchhub.org/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Best,
Erick
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Todd Long wrote:
> Dyer, James-2 wrot
Dyer, James-2 wrote
> The DIH Cache feature does not work with delta import. Actually, much of
> DIH does not work with delta import. The workaround you describe is
> similar to the approach described here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport ,
> which in my op
The DIH Cache feature does not work with delta import. Actually, much of DIH
does not work with delta import. The workaround you describe is similar to the
approach described here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport , which
in my opinion is the best way to i
