Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Neal Richter
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Customizing Solr to handle Leading Wildcard queries
>
> Oh wait.. looks l
hes.
>>
>> Can someone please tell me the steps to turn on this feature in Lucene
>> QueryParser? I am sure it will be helpful to many to document such a
>> procedure on the Wiki or somewhere else. (I am definitely going to do
>> that once I fix this. Too much troub
once I fix this. Too much trouble this seems to be)
> Also, which queryParser does Solr use by default?
>
> Thanks,
> Kumar
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:18 PM
>
lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Customizing Solr to handle Leading Wildcard queries
Hi ramuK,
I believe you can turn that "on" via the Lucene QueryParser, but of
course such searches will be slo(oo)w. You can also index reversed
tokens (e.g. *kumar --> rakum*) or you could index n-gram
ar -> "k u m a r $")
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: "Jana, Kumar Raja"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:49:24 AM
> Subject: RE: Customizing Solr to handle
. The case
> mentioned in the earlier mail is just one of the many instances I use
> this feature.
>
> -Kumar
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:e...@ehatchersolutions.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:59 PM
> To: solr-use
: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Customizing Solr to handle Leading Wildcard queries
On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
> Not being able to perform Leading Wildcard queries is a major
> handicap.
> I want to be able to perform
On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
Not being able to perform Leading Wildcard queries is a major
handicap.
I want to be able to perform searches like *.pdf to fetch all pdf
documents from Solr.
For this particular case, I recommend indexing the document type as a
separate
