Re: CopyField issue on Solr4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Erick Erickson
Major changes (i.e. 3 -> 4) have some such differences, but usually it's for the better. But it is sometimes disconcerting! Also, sometimes there are different defaults and you can get the old behavior back... Although you haven't quite said what was different. I know the stock typedefs have chang

Re: CopyField issue on Solr4.1

2013-01-30 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/30/2013 7:28 AM, Upayavira wrote: Stored fields are now compressed in 4.1. There's other efficiencies too in 4.0 that will also result in smaller indexes, but the compressed stored fields is the most significant. The compressed stored fields explains your smaller index. As to why you get

Re: CopyField issue on Solr4.1

2013-01-30 Thread Jack Krupansky
There are probably any number of changes between 3.x and 4.x to account for query differences. This includes bug fixes and in some cases new bugs, in areas such as the query parsers and various filters. The first step is to isolate a couple of examples of both false positive queries and false n

Re: CopyField issue on Solr4.1

2013-01-30 Thread Upayavira
Stored fields are now compressed in 4.1. There's other efficiencies too in 4.0 that will also result in smaller indexes, but the compressed stored fields is the most significant. Upayavira On Wed, Jan 30, 2013, at 01:59 PM, anarchos78 wrote: > Hello, > > I am using Solr 3.6.1 and I am very satis