ssage-
From: Anders Melchiorsen
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 4:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Confused by queries
Hello.
That is indeed an excellent article, thanks for pointing me at it. With
a title like that, it is no wonder that I was unable to google it on my
own.
Hello.
That is indeed an excellent article, thanks for pointing me at it. With
a title like that, it is no wonder that I was unable to google it on my
own.
It is probably the exception in this rule that has been confusing me:
If a BooleanQuery contains no MUST BooleanClauses, then a
doc
Solr/Lucene does not implement strict boolean logic. Here's an
excellent blog discussing this:
http://searchhub.org/dev/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Well, depends on what you indexed.
>
> Otis
> Solr & ElasticSearch Sup
Well, depends on what you indexed.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 22, 2013 5:48 PM, "Anders Melchiorsen"
wrote:
> Thanks, though I am still confused.
>
> How about this one:
>
> manu:apple => 1 hit
> +name:video => 2 hits
>
> manu:apple +name:video => 2 hits
>
> So
Thanks, though I am still confused.
How about this one:
manu:apple => 1 hit
+name:video => 2 hits
manu:apple +name:video => 2 hits
Solr ignores the manu:apple part completely?
Cheers,
Anders.
Den 22/01/13 23.16, Jack Krupansky skrev:
The first query:
name:ipod OR -name:ipod => 0 hits
The first query:
name:ipod OR -name:ipod => 0 hits
The "OR" and "-" are actually at the same level of the BooleanQuery, so the
"-" overrides the OR so it's equivalent to:
name:ipod -name:ipod => 0 hits
For the second query:
(name:ipod) OR (-name:ipod) => 3 hits
Pure negative queri
